DBR News

All that's happening in the world of DBR and street art in general...


Jan 06
2010

Census Uses a Charged Word on 2010 Survey

Posted by Armando Lerma in Untagged 

Armando Lerma

 

      (Jan. 6) -- As the government prepares to roll out the 2010 Census on March 15, one of the 10 questions on the form already has people cringing. Question 9 asks respondents to designate their race and gives them the option of choosing "Negro," a term many have considered derogatory and antiquated for years.

 

The question asks "What is person 1's race?" Of the 15 possible options, one is "Black, African Am., or Negro."

The Office of Management and Budget sets racial definitions for the Census Bureau and all federal statistical reporting. In its standards, it says a "Black or African American" person is "A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. Terms such as 'Haitian' or 'Negro' can be used in addition to 'Black or African American.'"

The agency last revised its standards in 1997, and the new definitions first appeared on the 2000 Census, which was also the first time people could identify as more than one race.

A U.S. Census Bureau spokesperson told the Web site The Grio that while the word "Negro" may be old-fashioned, there are still people who prefer to use it to identify themselves. She said the census questions were well-tested and that it was determined that using the word "outweighed the potential negatives."

Still, to many the word "Negro" is a throwback to Lester Walton's days, to slavery, Jim Crow laws and segregation.

The term may have been a preferable delineation of black heritage in 1913 when Lester A. Walton, managing editor of the New York Age, the country's first African-American newspaper, wrote a letter to The Associated Press imploring the group to use the term to refer to a race of people, not a skin color.

"The Census Bureau, in taking the last census, defined as Negroes those who were black. As the majority of my people are not black, in making out the census papers submitted by the enumerators, thousands classed themselves as either mulattoes or of mixed parentage. Others who were not black classed themselves as Negroes," he wrote.

But a century later, the distinction is antiquated and reprehensible to many.

"I don't think my ancestors would appreciate it in 2010," Pamela Reese Smith, a 56-year-old Rochester, N.Y., native, told the New York Daily News. "I don't want my grandchildren being called Negroes." Filed under: Nation, Top Stories, Only On Sphere Follow Sphere on Facebook and Twitter.

2010 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

Comments (1)Add Comment
Armando Lerma
...
written by Armando Lerma, January 07, 2010
We keep going backwards. =(

Write comment

busy

Latest Videos

Above on Walrus TV
The truth about marijuana
URANUS
Silver/Gray Ink Recipe

sticker_banner

Jaka_store
bago_store
Famoso_store
relishe
rkeah
spraycan lamps_store
Sticker_Catalog

 

Art_store

sex

Street_Store


Random Pictures
dbrLA
dbrLA
dbrLA
dbrLA
dbrLA
dbrLA
dbrLA
dbrLA
dbrLA
dbrLA

Online Users

0 user(s) and 5 guest(s) online | Show All

Newest Members